The Army and the Organizational Structure

The Army and the organizational structure that makes it run on the surface is a simple one. It is a Hierarchal/ grasp of Command structure, the collections come from levels so farther above those of us at my level that we receive them in the form of Fragmented Orders (FRAGOS), Warning Orders (WARNOS), host Personnel Messages (MILPER Messages) or simple word of mouth from the First sergeant-at-law or my Platoon Sergeant. These be the nevertheless two levels above me in a attach to. Outside of the company, there is only one additional rate other than that, and that is the Sergeant Major and he is the one that passes the information to the First Sergeant.From there, the messages or orders are passed bring land from me to my employees, or Sergeants and they handle the Soldiers in our ranks. If you look above the inner circle of a Battalion, then you stick out looking at Big Army or the subdivision of the Army and then eventually Department of the Defense and those decisions are ones that we have no control over (Walcott, C. E. , Warshaw, S. A. , & Wayne, S. J. 2001). We simply get the order, and execute, the movement of the order is a horizontal and vertical move of the order to ranks.This is the natural order of things and the problems occurs when a subordinate bypasses soulfulness in the Chain of Command and goes directly to a member in the Chain of Command directly, and this give notice be either way horizontally, because then you start losing track of what that member of the team is doing, or what their level of k straightwayledge of the plan is. (Tanguay, 2006) In a Tank club, the first level of management that you will very experience is the gunner. The lowest rank that he can be is a Corporal and is actually promotable delay to be promoted to Sergeant.From there you have the Sergeant, and these are the Non-Com perpetrationed Officers where the metal meets the meat. They have daily interactions with the employees, the Soldiers and they are responsible for the day-to-day well-being of these guys. The next level of management that you have is the Staff Sergeant and he is the Section Sergeant and runs two Gunners and four Soldiers. His job is to monitor the counseling, and ultimate progression of these effect. Then you have the Platoon Sergeant who is a Sergeant First Class who is in charge of two Staff Sergeants, four Sergeants, eight secondary enlisted soldiers and he monitors the platoon.Finally inside of the platoon you have the Platoon who is a 2nd or first Lieutenant who is the youngest officer in the military and is there to honestly learn from us and prepare for his further endeavors. Every Tank Company has three line platoons, with the same make up as listed above. The only addition to those personnel is that the company has a Headquarters Platoon which is made up of a Headquarters Platoon Sergeant who can be a Sergeant First Class or Staff Sergeant and the number of personnel inside of the HQ Platoon vary p er company.However, inside this platoon, there are two additional tanks, and they are for the Company Commander and the executive Officer and their crews. The First Sergeant runs the company from the enlisted side of the house and is in charge of all of the enlisted personnel and makes all of the decisions on that side. He is the highest ranking person in the company. The Company Commander is a headman and all officers in the company answer to him. The final person is the executive officer who is a 1st Lieutenant who is waiting to go to Captains Career Course and get his own company.Decisions, simply flow down through the chain of command and arrive at whichever level you are at. The problem that is noted with the Chain of Command method is that the ability to make any meaningful decisions is diminished (Heathfield, 2013). The mission of the military is simple, to do whatever we are called upon to do by our country whenever and wherever we are sent to do it. Tankers are combat arms and our mission is to close with and destroy the enemy. However, in times such as now when there is no rapid deployment actively going on, it falls upon us to constantly train to be ready.While we may simply want to go forth and find the bad guy and destroy him that is not always what we are doing. In the Pacific, we are also a contingency force that is used for humanist missions and we have to constantly train for this mission. This means that we can go from training to go to Afghanistan one day and fight Taliban, to the next day going to the Philippines to help with a Tsunami disaster relief. It just depends on the mission that we receive and we are constantly on a two hour recall and we have to be prepared for it. The military is such a different job and it is not a job that is for everyone.Honestly it is much of a lifestyle than a job and it is something that you have to embrace or you will not be successful for any period of time. In this area of operations, adaptability is paramount because we cannot guarantee where we will go at any time, we recently deployed some units to Afghanistan, while we are preparing to be ready to respond to anywhere in the Asia area of responsibility. To actually try and break it down into another type of organizational structure honestly would not work from a strategic or tactical point of view.